Ka Leo o ka Lahui, Volume II, Number 428, 8 ʻApelila 1892 — Bishop vs. Bishop. [ARTICLE]

Bishop vs. Bishop.

Tbat when Rer. 8. E. Bi*hoti , 4f % * bl&mes Bishop Willig, of the Angliean Church, lor allowing the lav* King Kalakaua to take the saornmen t, he plaeea himself in God".]>lace aa Judge, who onlj kr*ou - who is or is not aoceptable in liis gight This is a characteristic pieee of blasphemy on the p«rt of our professing religioaB teachers, but mon prominent with aueh blind leader* as Rev. S. E. BishopB, whoaro occasiondi> startled to hear their «rrors published or to eee it pointed out to them. his no wonder that the Hawaiian is a hypocrite to-dav in religious matters when such anti-christa, who profane the Holv Spirit and pervert the \Vord ot God. agsume to teach them the tru" wor«hip. As a Nation, the Hawaiiane wor? pincere and devout worshippere. ;ind hael principles and good traits ofcharacter, bat ainee they haVe hēen fed upon an imit&tion of the Truth by imitato» of the author of the all Baring Truth, they are now afloat on a se& of unoertainty as regarde &£igion. The teaching and the preoepte of soch charactersv as i H, E. Bishop who are world!y wise, have thrown Uiem into ehaoi, and he is the«6rst man to preach that the Hawaiians are idolaters still None but those who made them ko are best ahle to tell.