Ka Leo o ka Lahui, Volume II, Number 341, 9 Kekemapa 1891 — Complacency. [ARTICLE]

Kōkua No ke kikokikona ma kēia Kolamu

Complacency.

Ka L v o, vt>ioii)g Uie Hentiment of the Nalionai Pai ty and of those mo?t patrioticnllv interi?sted in the welfare of the country, has hoen making a co!isistent nght lbr Ihe weil lenown and weM vt;wtilated policy of our p.*rrlv. We aru charjred with incons?ist. n< y, whieh we donv. If \vo havA :idmitted to our e<v luom* po-iileui i>crBonalhiēs, it was ti?r thc [>urposc of discov*:rinf? or u»\o\)veriug friends and th? ol'the people, and • lur-

ing tho renegadOvS. If we have giv-1 en apaeo to republie:in exoorpts and speeches ii wad as pohtierJ lessons, tor the beneiit of on hu*h, anto teach the pso?)ie theīr 'power. Other topics tliat jvo mav have introduced and eomrnented 011 have been for the pt:rp. se of diseovering the battle p;round of party and the slogans of the campaigD . But the editorial utterances of Ka Leo have been Gonceived and put forth with a &teadfast, planned and consistent purDose, having in view the best welfare of our country and our people, and'the administrative and constitutional r< fornis necessary therefor. But since the Advcrtiser has eonceived the idea that our policy is going to rum the country and has given space in its eoluiaiiS to tel] its readers so; will not the Advertiser be generons and fair enough to state its grounds for such a belief. We are impressed with a feelthat we are battling • for the country's good and are curious to know what the Advertiser finds wrong in it. A siinple denumciation is not convincing. " Since you denounce Ka Lko and its supporters, you ought in honor, to state vour reasons why or else cease fooling with printers ink':